tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23471801.post1268047885270737199..comments2023-10-21T07:44:20.549-04:00Comments on The Existence Machine: On generic masculine languageRichardhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08014014605639738887noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23471801.post-33238572188931665352009-12-13T09:58:30.989-05:002009-12-13T09:58:30.989-05:00That's a good question, Jacob. I think with ph...That's a good question, Jacob. I think with philosophy I straddle the line, wanting to read it for what it's telling me, as if it were science or history, and wanting also to read it for the texture and style of the presentation. The two modes at times get in the way of each other. I'm not sure if that answers your question!Richardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08014014605639738887noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23471801.post-68646784347449964902009-12-12T17:48:46.526-05:002009-12-12T17:48:46.526-05:00Given the similar questions that come up in dealin...Given the similar questions that come up in dealing with O'Connor, what for you is the critical distinction between how you would judge a philosophical work and a novel, poem or story? Or is there?Jacob Russellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07090220157886320148noreply@blogger.com